Connecticut Cannabis Reform Project

Evidence-first policy work on Connecticut cannabis law

The Record

What actually happened in 2025

Proposed H.B. No. 5429 was filed, referred, heard, and never voted on. This is the published legislative and testimony record, reproduced from the General Assembly’s own files.

The bill

BillProposed H.B. No. 5429, Session Year 2025
LCO number2394
TitleAn Act Concerning Caregivers, Qualifying Patients and the Palliative Use of Cannabis
CommitteeJoint Committee on General Law
TextTwelve numbered lines directing that chapter 420f be amended, with eight enumerated changes

Sponsors

Introduced by Rep. Michael “MJ” Shannon, 117th District, and Rep. Laurie Sweet, 91st District.

Co-sponsored by Rep. Josh Elliott, 88th · Rep. Marcus Brown, 127th · Rep. Geraldo C. Reyes, 75th · Rep. Kadeem Roberts, 137th · Rep. Anne M. Hughes, 135th · Rep. Nicholas Menapace, 37th · Rep. Nick Gauthier, 38th.

All nine sponsors were Democrats. That is the reason the first ask on the For Legislators page is a Republican co-sponsor.

What the committee did

DateAction
January 17, 2025Referred to Joint Committee on General Law
February 3, 2025Reserved for subject matter public hearing
February 7, 2025Public hearing noticed for February 14
February 14, 2025Public hearing held
—No committee vote was ever taken. The bill died without a roll call.

Every testimony filed

The General Law Committee's testimony index for the bill contains sixty-six filings. Sixty-two supported, one opposed, two marked no position and one submitted general comments. The table below lists each filer once; several filed more than once. The Department of Consumer Protection filed without marking a position, raising four substantive concerns which are answered on the Concerns page.

Reproduced as published in the Committee’s testimony index. Names, affiliations and stated positions are those the filers themselves submitted. A few people filed twice.

Filed byAffiliation as filedPosition
Joseph AccettulloCannaWarriors / HighBazaarSupports
Joseph AccettulloOG CTSupports
AnonymousMedical cannabis advocateSupports
Stephen Bellantuono—Supports
Stacey Bernstein—Supports
Jason Blakesley—Supports
Diane Boudreau—Supports
Lauren BoyettCT CannaWarriorsSupports
James Brabham—Supports
Alex Brown—Supports
De-Andre BrownFallen Angels Music / BLM860Supports
Heather C.CT CannaWarriorsSupports
Bryan CafferelliCommissioner, Dept. of Consumer ProtectionNo position marked
Christina CapitanCT CannaWarriorsSupports
Sarah Cook—Supports
Ericka CousineauCannaWarriorsSupports
Dr Uma Dhanabalan—Supports
Erin Doolittle, MA MFTCT CannaWarriorsSupports
Jeffrey Duggan, PhDJXD BioanalyticsSupports
Brian DunphyMMP of CTSupports
Cassidy Erwin—Supports
Angerlyk Frytz—Supports
Michael GoodenoughDG AgTek LLCGeneral comments
Rebecca H.—Supports
Patrick HannonPatient since 2015Supports
Jacob Harvey—Supports
Laurie Joslin—Supports
Erin Gorman KirkOffice of the Cannabis OmbudsmanSupports
Rachel Lang—Supports
Kevin Liang—Supports
Jaime Lier—Supports
Jayson LutherMiddlesex HospitalNo position marked
Duncan MarkovichBetter Ways LLCSupports
Olivia McGuire—Supports
Jennifer MessoreLeaf MinistriesSupports
Douglas Moore—Supports
Andrea Mulcahy—Supports
Neal MuskNew England ClonesSupports
Andreas Papanicolaou—Supports
Avery Pessa—Supports
Norman PludeSweetTiva FarmsSupports
John Rhines—Supports
Cody RichardCannabis ConnectionSupports
Lou RinaldiData and policy analystSupports
Rafael Rosario—Supports
Audrey RotundaCannaWarriors / NECCASupports
Josiah SchleeCT CannaWarriorsSupports
Devan SchleichCannabis caregiverSupports
Kylah Shafer—Supports
Neenah Shafer—Supports
Rep. MJ ShannonState Representative, 117th DistrictSupports
Dana Elise Silverman—Supports
Jennifer SimpsonLeaf MinistriesSupports
Doug Szydlo—Supports
Carl TirellaBudr CannabisSupports
Carl Tirella JrBudr CannabisSupports
Bryan WilliamsICE DEESCH LLCSupports
Nathan Williams—Supports
Gwen Winkler—Opposes
Uzma Zakir, RPhbloomHigherSupports

Why this page exists

A proposal that has never been tested looks speculative. This one has been through a public hearing, and the result is on the record: the submitted testimony showed near-unanimous support among those who took a position, and no committee vote.

None of these filings is an endorsement of the 2027 draft, which was written in August 2026 and differs from the 2025 bill in substantial ways. The distinction is set out on the Supporters page.